tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post3638074251946196721..comments2023-11-12T10:43:42.313-05:00Comments on The PACSMan Pontificates: I'm Incensed!PACSmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14179728615522302371noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post-42609941985454465062010-11-06T11:44:56.027-04:002010-11-06T11:44:56.027-04:00I suppose (and realize I'm a babe in the woods...I suppose (and realize I'm a babe in the woods), that vendors what to do more than the standard specifies. So the solution is to have vendor specific fields. I'm not disagreeing with anything said here though; the basics really need to be there. But vendors should have the option of having vendor-specific features, knowing that these features are by definition not compatible with other Rob Dejournetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11451389128538898818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post-73702558897333407772010-09-19T20:02:58.524-04:002010-09-19T20:02:58.524-04:00Remember the line from Animal House about trusting...Remember the line from Animal House about trusting....Dalaihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17775491711029994911noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post-58338390176286555192010-09-17T15:44:08.853-04:002010-09-17T15:44:08.853-04:00set up a T-Party: Call it an F-Party for "Fo...set up a T-Party: Call it an F-Party for "Follow" the standard, "Full" compliance, or F'd up if not interoperable.<br /><br />You can be a male Sarah Palin for this party.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post-31241151588169886602010-09-17T13:51:31.959-04:002010-09-17T13:51:31.959-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Damien Evanshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15051470282079341951noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7862114977011705361.post-89115565715332178352010-09-15T07:18:17.466-04:002010-09-15T07:18:17.466-04:00Well we've just had a modality upgrade (One of...Well we've just had a modality upgrade (One of the biggest vendorS) that resulted in the modality unilaterally redefining a DICOM field from type 1C to type 1 in MWL transactions & the engineer quite happy to say "well we didn't require it before. We do now!". <br /><br />What is needed is a central, open and independent database of DICOM inconsistencies in a form (and PACSFerretnoreply@blogger.com